NASA proposes a ''new'' rocket.
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
NASA proposes a ''new'' rocket.
Not sure if this interests many people here, but Floridians better read up, becase the Government's space programme is going round in circles...
Okay, some background to this. In 2004, Dubya initiated his ''Vision for Space Exploration'' which cumulated in the Constellation Programme, which was to get the ol' American Flag back on the surface of the Moon. With Astronauts coming on for the ride of course. Constellation went on for 5 years and development on the Ares I and Ares V rockets, aswell as the Altair LSAM and Orion CEV was started. The Programme was thwarted by bad design, several redesigns and major delays. 5 years, and billions onf dollars later, they did manage to test an shuttle SRB with a dummy 5th segment and upper stage (called the ''Ares-IX'' Mission). The Ares V and Altair were way pie in the sky at the time, and the Orion CEV suffered from major redesigns (due to the Ares rockets). In 2010, President Obama killed Constellation, the programme was way underfunded and was making no progress. After months of political wrangling about the controversial descision, mainly focused on the Lay-offs caused by the cancellation of Constellation Programme (and of the Shuttle Programme, but that was going to happen regardless), Congress eventually came to a compromise and called on NASA to deliver a rocket which could initially lift 70-100 tons, and eventually reach 130 tons (Just over the LEO capacity of the Saturn V) and be ready for 2016.
Its now January, and NASA has proposed a new rocket to congress!
It makes use of the 8.4 Metre Shuttle ET, RS-25's (SSME's) and 5-segment SRB's strapped to either side. The upper stage is proposed to be a J-2X based (like the Ares I)
Now here's the catch, NASA have said to congress that this proposal (which could lift 100 tons to LEO) would NOT be ready by 2016, and would NOT be within budget.. Howver Congress did explicitly state that the launcher had to have the ET, SRB's and keep as much Shuttle and Constellation hardware as possible.
To me, this basically looks like it'll get cancelled by some president in five years time, just seems so much of the same..
Okay, some background to this. In 2004, Dubya initiated his ''Vision for Space Exploration'' which cumulated in the Constellation Programme, which was to get the ol' American Flag back on the surface of the Moon. With Astronauts coming on for the ride of course. Constellation went on for 5 years and development on the Ares I and Ares V rockets, aswell as the Altair LSAM and Orion CEV was started. The Programme was thwarted by bad design, several redesigns and major delays. 5 years, and billions onf dollars later, they did manage to test an shuttle SRB with a dummy 5th segment and upper stage (called the ''Ares-IX'' Mission). The Ares V and Altair were way pie in the sky at the time, and the Orion CEV suffered from major redesigns (due to the Ares rockets). In 2010, President Obama killed Constellation, the programme was way underfunded and was making no progress. After months of political wrangling about the controversial descision, mainly focused on the Lay-offs caused by the cancellation of Constellation Programme (and of the Shuttle Programme, but that was going to happen regardless), Congress eventually came to a compromise and called on NASA to deliver a rocket which could initially lift 70-100 tons, and eventually reach 130 tons (Just over the LEO capacity of the Saturn V) and be ready for 2016.
Its now January, and NASA has proposed a new rocket to congress!
It makes use of the 8.4 Metre Shuttle ET, RS-25's (SSME's) and 5-segment SRB's strapped to either side. The upper stage is proposed to be a J-2X based (like the Ares I)
Now here's the catch, NASA have said to congress that this proposal (which could lift 100 tons to LEO) would NOT be ready by 2016, and would NOT be within budget.. Howver Congress did explicitly state that the launcher had to have the ET, SRB's and keep as much Shuttle and Constellation hardware as possible.
To me, this basically looks like it'll get cancelled by some president in five years time, just seems so much of the same..
nickyf1- TORA Race Number : 271
Number of posts : 10770
Location : Glasgow
Registration date : 2008-09-26
Reputation : 73
Re: NASA proposes a ''new'' rocket.
lol @ nasa being within budget.
HCR generaltso- TORA Race Number : 12
Number of posts : 5771
Location : worldwide
Registration date : 2009-05-04
Reputation : 52
Similar topics
» Series Proposal: Honda Challenge (based on NASA HC)
» TCR Rocket League - Details
» TCR Rocket League - Registration
» FM3 - Lola Aston Rocket
» TCR Rocket League - Free Agency
» TCR Rocket League - Details
» TCR Rocket League - Registration
» FM3 - Lola Aston Rocket
» TCR Rocket League - Free Agency
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
Mon 22 Apr 2024 - 16:59 by EZT Neo 45
» Nasal8405 Bout Me
Sun 21 Apr 2024 - 10:12 by EZT MAKO 6669
» New to League Racing!
Mon 27 Nov 2023 - 15:18 by EZT MAKO 6669
» Returning driver IBlueIJaBBRexI
Tue 14 Nov 2023 - 14:53 by EZT MAKO 6669
» Hello
Mon 6 Nov 2023 - 0:25 by Rudie
» NAFFCAR Enduro - Stints
Thu 2 Nov 2023 - 22:04 by zrolizac
» NAFFCAR Enduro - Qualifying
Thu 2 Nov 2023 - 22:00 by zrolizac
» NAFFCAR Enduro - Live Timing
Thu 2 Nov 2023 - 21:57 by zrolizac
» NAFFCAR Enduro - Carlist and Build Rules
Thu 2 Nov 2023 - 21:50 by zrolizac