Unofficial GT3 Test At Nurburgring This Sunday

damn nice, i thought i ran a 59.0

guess i dont need the PI bump afterall

+654840299 to Biggs and avenger and lfcnick

| sbiggs | wrote:Please can we get this solved, otherwise I WILL be switching cars / backing out of the championship.

Backing out? Really? You did pick the Porsche knowing what the PI limit was. Besides...

| sbiggs | wrote:"This isn't a serious effort from Biggs Racing, it's more for the ships and giggles, and sheer entertainment value of the series. I'm much looking forward to the series, whether it be at the front or the back of the field."

I did a few laps last week and could only manage 02:01.716 in the Sagaris.

its troff wrote:I did a few laps last week and could only manage 02:01.716 in the Sagaris.

How do we get more PI? I think it would be much more fun if the car I was driving was faster than all the others*... about 690PI should do it.

Spoiler:

The Porsche defo needs more PI. Its a complete shatbox right now.

For what its worth I've only got the Sagaris as a basis of comparison but I've driven a few different Porsche builds and it was a lot more composed round the corners but seriously lacking any straightline speed.

Thats the story with all the 660 cars. im running minimal downforce on the viperand way slower than everyone

You can run low downforce on the Viper anyway though because its still fantastic in the corners and its suprisingly difficult to spin because of the downforce.

Thank you for the data guys.

Any Technical Regulation amendment, announced today, would not come onto force until after Meeting 1 anyway, so we will also look at data from Road Atlanta before making a final decision on any changes.

lfcnicklfc wrote:You can run low downforce on the Viper anyway though because its still fantastic in the corners and its suprisingly difficult to spin because of the downforce.

And still fantastically slow in a straight line

True lol and for comparisons sake i can only do a 1.56.7 round the Nurburgring

AJ wrote:Thank you for the data guys.

Any Technical Regulation amendment, announced today, would not come onto force until after Meeting 1 anyway, so we will also look at data from Road Atlanta before making a final decision on any changes.

I see no reason why any amendments cannot be made in time for the first meeting?

Double diffuser anyone?

Oh, and to add to that, Ill also suggest a boost for the Lambos too, as I believe from the Silverstone sessions, they also seem off the pace.

When can we expect said annoucnement, and why cant the PI be okay'd for round 1, or can we organise some more last minute testing?

the rules say that any rule changes must be made 7 days before an event for it to apply for the said event

yea, but this situation has been discussed and protested since december, me personally making the point for about 3 weeks. *grump*